The Ugly Truth About COVID

Posted On Apr 17, 2021 By admin With Comments Off

Nick Hudson, an actuary and private equity investor, co-founded Pandemics~ Data& Analytics( PANDA) in response to the many threats to civil rights and freedoms that have come during the COVID-1 9 pandemic response. While media and public health prisons have engaged in a campaign of smoke and mirrors — one that is perpetuating paralyzing nervousnes, needlessly, to this day — data and realities don’t lie.

Hudson and his team at PANDA, which include a data reporter, economist, medical doctors, big data specialist and public health experts, are using live data1 and open discipline to entitle the public to exert freedom of choice and retain free cultures. 2

Hudson spoke at the inaugural BizNews Investment Conference in March 2021, and his keynote address is above. He shows the ugly truth about COVID-1 9, which is that the world is being crippled by fear due to a fallaciou narrative. Anyone who challenges that narrative is being labeled as a lunatic, a peril or a danger to society, which is furthering the repression and unjustified fear.

Bringing COVID-1 9 Truth to Light

George Washington famously said, “Truth will ultimately prevail where there are plans carried out in order to deliver it to light.”3 With that in mind, Hudson interpreted the “seeds of a great tragedy” being embed with the speciou COVID-1 9 narrative, and has represented it a mission to get the truth out. So, what is the reality about the pandemic? According to Hudson: 4

A virus that presents increased risk to few and negligible hazard to most hit some regions

Few are susceptible to severe disease

There are several available treatments

Asymptomatic parties are not major motorists of disease

Lockdowns and disguise authorizations haven’t labor and instead justification huge harm

The prone were hurt instead of helped

The misinformation has been spewed from the start, including by World Health Organization director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. In a March 3, 2020, media briefing, he stated, “Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-1 9 cases going to die. By comparison, seasonal influenza generally kills far less than 1% of those infected.”5

But according to Hudson, the 3.4% represents instance fatality rate( CFR ), which is the number of deaths from COVID-1 9 divided by the number of cases of COVID-1 9, while the 1% is illnes fatality rate( IFR ), or the number of deaths divided by all infected individuals.

“By conflating these two separate phases( CFR and IFR ), ” Hudson said, “Tedros was effectively lying.” Quantitative scientist John Ioannidis, prof of medicine at the Stanford Prevention Research Center, calculated the IFR for COVID-1 9 in its examination of 61 seroprevalence studies, which was a median of 0.23%, and 0.05% in parties younger than 70.6

Based on this, the IFR for COVID-1 9 be less than that of the flu. And wouldn’t you know it, in a New England Journal of Medicine editorial published March 26, 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci, conductor of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases( NIAID ), and peers expressed the view that “the overall clinical consequences of Covid-1 9 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza.”7

The media have squelched this knowledge, Hudson mentioned, along with the fact that there’s a 1,000 goes difference in fatality among the persons younger than 19 and those older than 70 — something that should have been taken into account in the pandemic response.

Is COVID-1 9 Really a’ Novel Virus’?

Further inflaming widespread fright is the idea that COVID-1 9 is a “novel virus, ” which becomes it sound like it’s something humans have never encountered before. But is it genuinely? According to Hudson 😛 TAGEND

“The reality is that the coronavirus is a very close relative , not even a separate subspecies, a very close relative of the 2003 SARS virus. The report contains seven relevant coronaviruses known to cause disease in humans, probably many others, and four members of them are in general circulation.

Annual, world-wide dissemination. So the name of this illnes is terribly inconsistent. Now a had increased by any call, SARS. A discrepancy of SARS. It’s not novel.”

One study even pointed out that 81% of beings not exposed to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that reasons COVID-1 9, were still able to mount an immune response against it, which “suggests at least some built-in immune protection from SARS-CoV-2 … ”8

Nonetheless, Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO’s technological lead-in for the COVID-1 9 pandemic, stated that “a majority of the world’s population is prone to illnes from this virus.”9 This is the first of two key elements that, Hudson said, lead to “homosapienophobia” — the idea that everyone is dangerous until proven healthy.

The idea of universal susceptibility to COVID-1 9 is nonsense, Hudson mentioned, as was demonstrated early on with the Diamond Princess cruise ship. Among the 3,711 fares and crew onboard the Diamond Princess, 712( 19.2%) be positive for SARS-CoV-2, and of these 46.5% were asymptomatic at the time of testing. Of those picturing manifestations, simply 9.7% required intensive care and 1.3%( nine) died. 10

PANDA data likewise showed that, starting in February 2021, there was not universal susceptibility to the virus. Their data depicted cumulative COVID-1 9 deaths per million people. In Africa, Southeast Asia and Oceania, the population fatality rate was 112 per million compared against 710 per million in Europe and the Americas.

As for Africa, Southeast Asia and Oceania, Hudson said, “the population fatality rate there approximately isn’t an epidemic. In a ordinary time, they’d have 10,000 deaths per million from all causes.”

Nervousnes Mongering Over Asymptomatic Spread

The second element that enables the doctrine of “everyone being a danger” to continue is the idea of asymptomatic spread driving sicknes. “I was absolutely aghast to be informed about the poor quality of the science” behind it, Hudson said.

One of the influential articles involved one female who reportedly infected 16 collaborators while she was asymptomatic. 11 The study was widely used to suggest that asymptomatic spread was coming, but contention later followed over whether the woman was actually asymptomatic when the others were infected or if she was symptomatic and is dealt with for flu-like evidences at the time. 12

In June 2020, Kerkhove also made it very clear that people who have COVID-1 9 without any evidences “rarely” disseminate the disease to others. But in a striking about-face, WHO then backtracked on the statement exactly one day last-minute. June 9, 2020, Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of WHO’s emergencies program, swiftly backpedaled Van Kerkhove’s statement, saying the statements were “misinterpreted or perhaps we didn’t use the most elegant texts to explain that.”1 3

“It’s utter, deliver sillines, ” Hudson said, adding that Fauci likewise stated in January 2020, “asymptomatic transmission has never been the operator of outbreaks. The operator of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person.”1 4

A JAMA Network Open study later find, in December 2020, that asymptomatic transmission is not a primary driver of infection within households. 15 A study in Nature Communications likewise obtained “there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to discovered close contacts.”1 6

Lockdown Madness

The myth of widespread asymptomatic spread is what was used to justify worldwide lockdowns of healthy parties. “Bruce Aylward will go down in history as a criminal of gigantic prestige, ” Hudson said, referring to Aylward’s role as heads of state of a WHO team that saw Wuhan, China, and concluded lockdowns were working to stop COVID-1 9 spread. 17

“He takes a delegation to China, depletes a few days, then comes back and says everyone should follow China’s response, the doctrine of universal susceptibility, ” Hudson said. Yet, prior to the COVID-1 9 pandemic official the guiding principles for pandemic response programmes recommend against large-scale quarantine of the healthy.

In fact, WHO wrote that during an influenza pandemic, quarantine of exposed individuals, entry and exit screening and strip ending are “not recommended in any circumstance.”1 8P TAGEND

Likewise, in 2021 a study published in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation attained no significant benefits on COVID-1 9 example proliferation in regions expending more restricted nonpharmaceutical interventions( NPIs) such as mandatory stay-at-home and business close says( i.e ., lockdowns ). 19

Data compiled by PANDA likewise find no link between lockdowns and COVID-1 9 deaths per million people. The canker followed a trajectory of linear wane regardless of whether or not lockdowns were imposed.

What isn’t a lie, nonetheless, is that lockdowns case a great deal of harm. Child mortality, poverty, starvation and joblessness are on the rise, as are slows in medical treatment and diagnosis, psychological disorder among boy, suicide and deaths of despair.

Education has been interrupted for an estimated 1.6 billion children, Hudson said, and a cross-examine of 2,000 U.S. adults revealed that 1 in 6 Americans started rehabilitation for the first time during 2020. Almost half( 45%) of the survey respondents confirmed that the COVID-1 9 pandemic was the driving reason that triggered them to seek a therapist’s help. 20 According to Hudson 😛 TAGEND

“Perhaps the hardest thing for me to swallow about all of this is in undergraduate epidemiology, it is a well-known finding that when you are confronted with a disease with abrupt advantage graduation, as you are with coronavirus , appropriate measures to generally hushes the spread of the disease have the effect, reliably, of transfer the disease load onto the vulnerable, who we should be protecting. They worsen coronavirus mortality.”

Mask Rhetoric Is Misleading

It’s been touted that face masks are essential to stopping the spread of COVID-1 9 and trying to save 130,000 lives in the U.S. alone. 21 But in 2019, the World Health Organization analyzed 10 randomized restrained trials and concluded, “there was no evidence that facemasks are effective in reducing transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”2 2

Only one randomized self-controlled inquiry has been conducted on mask usage and COVID-1 9 communication, and it attained masks did not statistically significantly reduce the incidence of infection. 23

You may remember that in the early days of the pandemic, face masks were not recommended for the general public. In February 2020, Christine Francis, the expert consultants for illnes prevention and control at WHO headquarters, was featured in a video, holding up a expendable face mask.

She said, “Medical masks like this one cannot protect against the new coronavirus when consumed alone … WHO simply recommends the use of concealments in specific cases.”2 4 As of March 31, 2020, WHO was still advising against the use of face masks for people without indications, stating that there is “no evidence” that such cover-up habit frustrates COVID-1 9 transfer. 25

But by June 2020, the rhetoric change over time. Citing “evolving evidence, ” WHO switched their recommendation and began advising governments to encourage the general public to wear masks where there is widespread transmission and physical distancing is difficult. 26 Yet that same day, June 5, 2020, WHO published an announcement stating: 27

“At present, “were not receiving” direct evidence( from studies on COVID-1 9 and in healthy beings in local communities) on the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy beings in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-1 9. ”

The U.S. Midsts for Disease Control and Prevention did a similar about-face on cover-up application, quoting research studies of two hair dressers in Missouri, who had allegedly been symptomatic with COVID-1 9 and styled 139 clients’ hair.

None of the clients tested positive for COVID-1 9, which the CDC indicated was because they and the stylists wore masks. 28 Hudson accepts, however, that the customers were probably young and not susceptible to the virus in the first place.

Another study published in the CDC’s journal Emerging Infectious Diseases stated, “We did not find evidence that surgical-type face disguises are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when worn by polluted parties( generator dominance) or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility.”2 9

PANDA data likewise evidenced no differences in transmission in countries with disguise commissions and those without. Still, state officials are now advising you are able to double or triple up on concealments to draw them work better.

Inoculation Being Sold as a Ticket to Freedom

People who stand to induce innumerable billions out of COVID-1 9 inoculations are now selling them as a ticket to freedom, Hudson nations 😛 TAGEND

“How convenient that we now have a logic that tells us that we need to vaccinate 7.8 billion people for an illness that has a want survival rate of 99.95% for parties under the age of 70. The profiteering here is naked. It is transparent.”

It’s a sad situation when girls, who aren’t at increased risk, are rowing up for inoculations simply to get their frees back, he supplements. When you include in all the other incompatibilities and lies — PCR research that are not capable of diagnosing infectiousness, overstated death figures, restrictions on travel, media publicity and arbitrary principles, like the CDC’s recent change in physical distancing in classrooms from 6 feet to 3 feet3 0 — it’s as though we’re living in an Orwellian reality.

With looming vaccine passports, the loss of personal immunities is at an unprecedented level, while parties are generally “enslaved by fear” — fear of infection or reinfection, “long COVID, ” resurgence and mutant variants. “The underpinnings of our civilization are under threat, ” Hudson indicated, and we have a choice. “We’ve been propagandized up against a brink, will we be pushed off or will we push back? ”

He advises people to support the Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for “focused protection” and finding a middle ground between fastening down an entire economy and just “letting it rip.” As of April 4, 2021, the declaration has obtained 41,890 signatures from medical practitioner and over 13,796 signatures from medical and public health scientists. 31

In addition, the declaration is open for public signatures and has mustered 764,089 from concerned citizens around the world. The website allows you to read and sign the declaration, asks countless frequently asked questions, shares the social sciences behind the recommendations and was explained that the declaration was written.

PANDA also published a protocol for reopening civilization “to provide a road map out of the devastate repetition of lockdowns.”3 2 Hudson quoted Nelson Mandela, who stated heroism is not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. We all need to strive for courage and brace awareness campaigns aimed at stopping the destructive narrative, allaying fright and protecting future freedom.