COVID Symptoms of Power: Tech Billionaires Harvest Humanity

Posted On May 27, 2020 By admin With Comments Off

Bill Gates has built a world-wide territory around his technologies and “philanthropic” works. His sheer money has allowed him to become a veritable superpower in his own right, rising to become the unelected world health tsar on COVID-1 9. Indeed, the World Health Organization and the White House pandemic response squad even scrapes to his nonexistent medical expertise.

Life cannot and will not go back to ordinary until we can vaccinate the entire “worlds population”, Gates says, and that same sentimentality is being echoed from government leaders and health authorities around the world. Never mind the fact that actual scientists and medical investigates are finding all sorts of simple, inexpensive and safe strategies to address this illness.

But vaccinating the global population isn’t enough, in Gates’ noses. We must also implement surveillance of infection and vaccination status. Not astonishingly, Gates’ recommendations benefit himself most of all.

As are addressed in “Bill Gates — Most Dangerous Philanthropist in Modern History ?” the Bill& Melinda Gates Foundation gifts billions to the very same business and industries that the Foundation owns stocks and bonds in.

Using nonprofit money to advance research for firms you’re invested in is illegal, hitherto he’s been getting apart with this for many years. At the same time, his Foundation get tax breaks for the altruistic gives it reaches coin from. Remember, he has “donated” tens of billions, hitherto his net worth has doubled. This is largely because his “donations” are tax deductible investments.

Pandemic Fear-Mongering Pays Off for Tech Fellowship

While unemployment has reached a historical high-pitched during this pandemic, the financial crush is not felt by some. In fact, Gates and other tech billionaires are cashing in large-hearted, in a variety of different ways.

In a May 8, 2020, article1 in The Intercept, Naomi Klein reports on how New York is duty Gates with reinventing the state’s “post-Covid reality, with an emphasis on permanently integrating engineering into every facet of civic life.”

May 6, 2020, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced the government is partnering with the Bill& Melinda Gates Foundation to develop “a smarter education system” focused on online memorize. This, in spite of the fact that the Common Core curriculum — the Gates Foundation’s previous aim at remaking American education2 — has been an abysmal failing. 3

The state is also partnering with Google, and Cuomo has asked former Google CEO Eric Schmidt to honcho a brand-new board to programme the state’s technological infrastructure. 4 Schmidt attached Cuomo during a briefing, saying “The first priorities … are focused on telehealth, remote learning and broadband … ” As noted by Klein: 5

“It has taken some time to gel, but something resembling a coherent pandemic stun concept is beginning to emerge.

Call it the Screen New Deal. Far more hi-tech than anything “were having” seen during previous cataclysms, the future that is being rushed into being as the bodies still pile up gives our past weeks of physical quarantine not as a unpleasant demand to save lives, but as a living laboratory for a permanent — and highly profitable — no-touch future …

It’s a future in which our homes are never again exclusively personal spaces, but are also, via high-speed digital connectivity, our academies, our doctor’s departments, our gyms, and, if established by the state, our confinements …

It’s a future in which our every move, our every parole, our every rapport is trackable, traceable and data-mineable by unprecedented collaborations between government and tech giants.

If all of this sounds familiar, it’s because, pre-Covid, this precise app-driven, gig-fueled future was being sold to us in the word of friction-free convenience and personalization. But many of us had concerns …

Today, a great many of those well-founded concerns are being swept away by a tidal wave of panic, and this warmed-over dystopia is going through a rush-job rebranding.

Now, against a terrifying backdrop of mass fatality, it is being sold to us on the questionable promise that these technologies are the only possible way to pandemic-proof our lives, the crucial keys to keeping ourselves and our loved ones safe …

At the heart of this see is seamless consolidation of government with a handful of Silicon Valley whales — with public class, hospitals, doctor’s bureaux, police and armed all outsourcing( at a high cost) many of their core purposes to private tech companies.”

In her commodity — which is well importance interpret in its entirety — Klein reviews how Schmidt and Gates have been working and propagandizing towards the future that is now staring us square in the face, and how the surveillance apparatus that consumers have been railing against are being currently rebranded as the answer to everyone’s health concerns.

In a May 6, 2020, clause, Vox’s Theodore Schleifer weighed in on Cuomo’s decision to hand over the proverbial keys to the state to tech billionaires whose philanthropy ever culminates up benefiting themselves the most: 6

“Details are scarce about exactly how much power these groups will have beyond problem recommendations or whether their labour is likely to be public. But Gates could unexpectedly have the ability to recommend what types of things are taught to the state’s students in a’ reimagined’ arrangement.

Schmidt could support the territory to significantly embrace remote health care services that could be controversial. While both have been successful business leaders, such concerns would mirror the broader assessment of billionaire generosity: that the matter is’ help’ offers a few cases wealthy people some undemocratic affect over American public policy.”

Schmidt Futures Wants to Make Private Data Public

While little visible than Gates, Schmidt can hardly be trusted any more than Gates. Schmidt Futures — Eric and Wendy Schmidt’s philanthropic initiative, which “seeks to improve societal outcomes through the pithy development of emerging science and technologies that can benefit humanity”7 — admits that one of its approaches is to “liberate private data with a public purpose.”8

Clearly, infection status precipitates into a category of private data that was currently rebranded as having a “public purpose.” As noted on its website: 9

“There is a tremendous opportunity to use data collected by the private sector to solve societal challenges, and in do so create the programmes needed to reach parties at magnitude. Instances of data types include mobile, social media, e-commerce, remotely sensed/ satellite, and sensor data. Advances in data science and machine learning are increasing our capacity to use and translate these data.”

‘Unaccountable Monopolists’ Replace Elected Representatives

In a May 14, 2020, Guardian article, Zephyr Teachout and Pat Garofalo comment: 10

“Even if Schmidt and Gates had good programs, Cuomo’s knighting of them is offensive to American self-government. Nobody voted for them and they are accountable to no one. Cuomo, often accused of is way too close to big campaign sponsors, is tripling down: he is simply allowing billionaires to plan our future instantly, taking out the middlemen.

In occurrence you had any suspense that this is a new chassis of authority worming its road into our old-time democratic highways, Cuomo anointed these tsars at the exact same experience that he took vast new superpowers away from the territory legislature, 11 which has still not been bracing regular legislative hearings since 1 April …

Turning away from locally-elected representatives, and towards billionaires with no accountability, represents a abominable erosion of democratic decision-making: Cuomo is quite literally replacing elected representatives with private, inscrutable monopolists. And too many other lawmakers across the U.S. are doing the same thing.”

The Gates, Soros and Clinton Contact Tracing Group

Whether preplanned or not, the COVID-1 9 pandemic is clearly being used to usher in highly controversial alterations that are unmistakably totalitarian-building, in particular the private take-over of authority through public-private partnerships.

Contact tracing performs as a convenient bridge1 2 for this hostile takeover parading as “aid.” Not only is Big Tech offering up contact marking apps, self-serving billionaires are also funding contact marking radicals that will provide “boots on the ground” works.

For illustration, Partners in Health — the group selected by Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker to conduct COVID-1 9 contact marking expending units of inspectors to interview people who test positive — is funded by Gates and one of the richest adults in the world, George Soros. The William J. Clinton Foundation has also money Partners in Health in the past. 13

Chelsey Clinton sits on its board of trustees, and one of the group’s co-founders, Jim Kim, spent three times at the WHO1 4 and is currently the president of the World Bank. He rejoined Collaborators in Health’s board of directors in January 2019.15

UK Demands Answers About COVID Data Deal

Meanwhile, on the other side of the pond, OpenDemocracy and the tech start-up Foxglove are expecting the U.K. authority share the details of its patient data is working with Big Tech. In a May 7, 2020, announce, OpenDemocracy.net writes: 16

“Outside of the frightful death toll, perhaps the most far-reaching global upshot of the pandemic is the rapid expansion of surveillance in our everyday lives. In the appoint of thumping back the pandemic, authorities around the world are giving tech giants substantial access to valuable stores of health data.

Britain is no different. On 28 March, a blog1 7 calmly appeared on the website of the cherished National Health Service. It announced what are likely to be the largest handover of NHS patient data to private business in autobiography.

U.S. tech giants Amazon, Microsoft, and Google — plus two controversial AI films announced Faculty and Palantir — are apparently assisting the NHS in tracking hospital available resources and with a view to providing a’ single generator of truth’ about the epidemic, in order to stem its spread.”

While the sum of British health data being shared with these companies has been described as “unprecedented, ” the U.K. government has yet to release the details about the partnership.

Suspiciously, Palantir is reportedly ply its COVID-1 9 Datastore services to the NHS for simply PS1. 18 This despite the fact that its services are estimated to cost around PS88, 000 a few weeks, and that’s just for payments. 19 How and why is Palantir giving away its services for free? The old-time proverb, “There’s no such thing as a free lunch” seems relevant now.

OpenDemocracy also questions how the artificial intelligence( AI) startup Faculty has been possible to acre seven different government contracts worth roughly PS1 million in the last 18 months. 20

“We have rules in Britain which mean journalists and members of the public can access information about such considers, so that they can answer precisely these sorts of questions. But now the UK government is acting as though these statutes no longer apply, ” OpenDemocracy writes.

UK Government Ignores FOIA Request

Foxglove referred Freedom of Information Act( FOIA) required to be the U.K. government on April 3, 2020. A reply is required within 20 making epoches, hitherto no response has been forthcoming. The British Intelligence Commissioner’s Office, the independent regulator responsible for FOIA enforcement, has announced2 1 it has loosened prosecution for the length of the pandemic crisis.

That seems suspiciously convenient, considering bargains are being obligated in secret that shouldn’t be, and panic is being drummed up without much real-world data to support the narrative that we’re still in a high-risk situation. 22

“Although the wording of the advertisement was vague, it risks leaving the public with no practical way to nurse the government to account — indefinitely, ” OpenDemocracy commonwealths, supplementing 😛 TAGEND

“We have given the UK government until 11 May to exhaust the information requested about these big COVID data transactions. If they are unable to do so, we will consider seeking rebuttals in the courts.

The public urgently needs to know not only how their personal information is being transactions, and who has access to it. But likewise whether this pandemic meaning that our rights to ask questions, and to scrutinize the actions of our chairwomen, are fundamentally endangered. COVID-1 9 cannot be an excuse for governments and corporations to evaded accountability.”

Tech Initiative Seeks to Alter Global Behavior

Anyone still alive under the misguided spell that governments’ responses to this pandemic are simply temporary emergency measures need to rapidly reassess. As to be provided by Vox, 23 tech billionaires like Gates and Schmidt are hard at work trying to convince governments and the public at large that simply they can save us from another pandemic.

Such is the focus of the Pandemic Action Network, is accountable for the #MaskingForAFriend Twitter campaign, pushed by Hillary Clinton and other luminaries. 24

“ … the #MaskingForAFriend safarus … seeks to change personal action. But its most important aspiration is to change government action, ” Vox writes.

“This initiative is one of the more forward-looking attempts from philanthropy to determine what the world looks like after the crisis, and one of the few focused on political advocacy. The propagandize is small for now, with precisely $1.5 million in initial money from Schmidt Futures, the Bill& Melinda Gates Foundation, and other backers.

But the Pandemic Action Network aims to lead a distres campaign that shapes the policy debate, a debate that will be at the fore of the next brandish of pandemic response efforts.”

Digital Health Passports Coming to 15 People

A lead-in to global autocracy, predicated on protecting public health and frustrating another pandemic, is the issuance of “digital health passports.” According to the British tech magazine Verdict, 25 coronavirus digital health passports are now being supplied to 15 commonwealths.

The passport is “designed to make it easier for individuals to return to work after the Covid-1 9 coronavirus pandemic” — as if we’ve never been able to return to normal life after any other epidemic or pandemic scare. In a May 11, 2020, essay Verdict reports: 26

“These countries will include Italy, Portugal, France, Panama, India, the U.S ., Canada, Sweden, Spain, South africans, Mexico, United Arab Emirates and The Netherlands, with the goal of furnishing 50 million digital state passports … The Covi-pass2 7 will work using a shade structure of dark-green, amber, red to indicate whether the individual has tested positive or negative for Covid-1 9 and relevant health information.

Firstly, the subscribers downloads the app and penetrates key information such as name, address, age and substantiates their identity exercising their fingerprint or a facial scan.

They then take a Covid-1 9 test, being implemented by an authorized healthcare professional, and the results are searched into the Covi-pass. They can then use the digital health passport to certify their health status to enable’ a safe return to work, life, and safe travel.’”

According to Covipass.com, 28 the app will display “your COVID-1 9 experiment biography and immunoresponse and other related health information.”

As I’ve territory before, a RT-PCR( turn transcription polymerase chain reaction) exam reaction is mostly worthless, since a) it merely identifies the presence of SARS-CoV-2 genetic fabric , not the actual virus, and b) you can get infected at any time after you get your test answers, rendering the “verification” of your infection status is ineffective.

According to a recent speech by U.S. President Donald Trump, his government is mustering the military to distribute the inoculation once ready, which could be as early as the end of 2020.

At the same time, the U.S. Senate has voted to renew federal surveillance influences that would otherwise have expired, 29 and an ill-named bill, HR 6666, would position the government in charge of COVID-1 9 tracking and find, costing taxpayers a whopping $100 billion. 30

Virus Surveillance and Civil Sovereignty Collide

As predicted in a Law3 60 article3 1 published April 26, 2020, virus surveillance is now colliding head-on with civil liberties 😛 TAGEND

“Imagine your telephone buzzing with an alert: Someone who delivered you at the convenience store has be positive for COVID-1 9. Based on locale data transmitted via a smart-alecky phone app, permissions imagine the stranger uncovered you to the coronavirus. You might be infected.

The alert steers you to self-quarantine for 14 eras to prevent further spread of the deadly ailment. In the app, a map of color-coded specks exposes the residents of the your residence municipality. You notice the dot are connected with you, previously light-green, has turned to yellow — now everyone else with the app knows you could be dangerous.

Whether the situation seems Orwellian or absolutely essential could depends on your answer to a rhetorical question Dr. Anthony Fauci, lead of the National Institute of Allergy and Contagious diseases, recently posed during a live Snapchat interview.’ Do you give up a little liberty to get a little protection? ’ he said.”

The answer to that question should be a resounding “no.” The idea that government can prevent you safe against a virus by giving up your civil liberties is a fantasy that must be outgrown. As noted by CNN Business: 32

“It made the attacks of September 11, 2001 to shove aside the previous decade’s phobia of mass surveillance, and usher in an period where many of us imagined the regime was probably skimming our emails, in exchange for keeping us safe from horror.

Over the next 15 years, billions of beings agreed to a tacit deal where Facebook or Google were permitted to learn a amazing amount about them in exchange for free access to messaging apps, news, and shared slides … Eventually, that mutated into the elevations exemplified by Cambridge Analytica — private corporations hoovering up the online lives of tens of millions in order to try to sway elections.

But the challenge presented by Covid-1 9 — and the urgent it is necessary tracing contacts and progress — is of another flake of intimacy … Technology is again claim the mantle of the savior … embedding into our phones anonymous methods of knowing who and we still have preparations infected and when … If they become ubiquitous, where does this new inquiry aspiration? … Will we are looking at 2020 as the moment privacy ultimately melted? ”

It’s time to fully recognize that surveillance has become the biggest for-profit industry on the planet, and your entire world is now being targeted for profit.

For a better understanding of what you’re giving up by leading together with the mainstream narration that it is necessary to Big Tech to save us, identify my clause about social psychologist and Harvard professor Shoshana Zuboff and her singular record, “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism.”