China Attacks T&M, Adidas, Nike and Other Fashion Brands Over Their Stance on Xinjiang

BEIJING — China’s ruling Communist Party is lashing out at H& M and other apparel and footwear labels as it retaliates for Western sanctions imposed on Chinese officials accused of human rights abuses in the northwestern region of Xinjiang.

The assaults began when the party’s Youth League on Wednesday called attention on its social media account to an H& M evidence in March 2020 that it would stop buying cotton grown in Xinjiang. The Swedish retailer said it was “deeply concerned” about reports of forced labor there.

On Thursday, a party newspaper, the Global Times, cited Burberry, Adidas, Nike and New Balance as having fixed “cutting remarks” about Xinjiang cotton as early as two years ago. Celebrity including Wang Yibo, a popular singer and performer, announced they were breaking endorsement contracts with H& M and Nike.

Beijing often criticizes foreign clothing, automobile, movement and other firebrands for actions by their governments or to pressing companies to conform to its official status on Taiwan, Tibet and other sensitive issues.

Companies generally defend and mutate websites or advertising to maintain access to China’s populous sell. But Xinjiang is an exceptionally thorny issue. Western firebrands face adversity at home to distance themselves from possible abuses.

More than one million people in Xinjiang, the majority of members of them from mainly Muslim ethnic groups, have been confined to work camps, according to foreign researchers and governments. Beijing denies molesting them and says it is trying to promote economic evolution and stamp out radicalism.

On Monday, the 27 -nation European Union, the United Regime, Britain and Canada collectively announced hurtle and financial imposing sanctions on four senior Chinese officials blamed for abuses in Xinjiang.

Beijing retaliated by saying it would foist unidentified penalties against European legislators and a German researchers who has circulated information about the detention camps.

H& M’s statement last March quoth a decision by the Better Cotton Initiative, an manufacture group that promotes environmental and labor standards, to stop licensing Xinjiang cotton because it was “increasingly difficult” to marks how it was produced. In September, H& M announced today that it would stop working with a Chinese creator that was accused of using forced labor in a legion unrelated to the Swedish brand.

In January, Washington enforced a restrict in January on cotton from Xinjiang, a major supplier to garment producers for Western markets.

China’s official outrage has so far focused on Europe, maybe because relations with the EU were relatively friendly amid acrimony with Washington over trade disputes and accusations of spying and technology theft.

Official criticism of H& M reflected that tone of grudge at being hurt by a friend.

“How can H& M ingest Chinese rice and then smash China’s pot? ” state television said in a commentary on Wednesday.

On Thursday, internet users pointed to clothing firebrands Uniqlo of Japan and The Gap of the United Government as other possible sinners. It was unclear how many of those histories were members of the public and how many were operated by the decision party’s enormou hype apparatus.

Pop wizard Wang Yibo’s announcement that he was quitting as a Nike “brand ambassador” didn’t mention Xinjiang but said he “firmly refuses any words and actions that pollute China .”

Others including performer Huang Xuan and Song Qian, a singer and actress also known as Victoria Song who is a former member of Korean pop group f( x ), announced they would objective promotion contracts with H& M. Actress Tang Songyun said she was breaking ties with Nike.

Chinese athletic shoe brand ANTA announced it was pulling out of BCI, the industry cotton group.

Read more: time.com

Sharing is caring!