Abbreviated Pundit Round-up: Israeli elections and motion in Democratic primaries « $60 Miracle Money Maker




Abbreviated Pundit Round-up: Israeli elections and motion in Democratic primaries

Posted On Oct 8, 2019 By admin With Comments Off on Abbreviated Pundit Round-up: Israeli elections and motion in Democratic primaries



Haaretz 😛 TAGEND

Israel Election 2019: Netanyahu Fails to Secure Majority, Gantz Leads, Arabs Surge, Exit Polls Show

Two exit poll establish Kahol Lavan overtaking Likud, one survey has them restrained# Labor Party, Democratic Union make it in# Kahanist party cleaned off political map

x

Early signalings suggest @Netanyahu miscalculated – targeting #Arab voters merely rendered gargantuan #Arab turnout while he seems to have failed to swallow fairly right-wing voters to establish #Likud largest defendant. Knowledge that #Putin facilitated him more than #Trump had to be major disappointment.

— Robert Satloff (@ robsatloff) September 17, 2019

Here is the Putin reference 😛 TAGEND

His ties to Putin, including with regard to, are appreciated by him as important in gathering in polls from Israel’s gigantic community of Russian speakers.

x

BREAKING: In first announce ballots speech Netanyahu refuses to concede. condemns the media for biased coverage

— Barak Ravid (@ BarakRavid) September 18, 2019

Since establishing a organization is who “wins”, it is gonna be a while before we know who that is. There are lots of moving percentages. Netanyahu rivals deeply scorn each other, and harmony moves may lose them voting members. Of trend, they intensely shun him as well, so – _( tsu) _ /-. We won’t know who acquired for a while( think in periods, maybe weeks ). But it’s clear that Netanyahu lost his bid for a majority.

x

With 90% of the vote counted: -Gantz’s Kahol Lavan 32 -Netanyahu’s Likud 31 -The Joint List 13 -Yisrael Beiteinu 9-Shas 9-United Torah Judaism 8 -Yamina 7-Labor-Gesher 6-Democratic Union 5https :// t.co/ rKJ2enbn 2J

— Haaretz.com (@ haaretzcom) September 18, 2019

x

We won’t certainly know until tomorrow how many posteriors everyone has.Then we have to see if Lieberman recommends Gantz or Unity and if Joint List says Gantz or None.So still 1-4 days from knowing who will go first even

— ((( Will Cubbison ))) A–A* A–A* A–A( tm) A–Aoe A–ASSA–A’A–A( tm) A–A! A–A* A–AY (@ wccubbison) September 18, 2019

Closer to home from NBC 😛 TAGEND

NBC/ WSJ tally: Biden guides Dem 2020 environment, Warren’s approval grows

While Biden predominates among more moderate Democrats and black voters, Warren overperforms among whites and radicals.

The survey likewise shows that Warren has certain advantages in feeling, and that she gets the most second-choice support.

Biden causes the overall horse race with endorse from 31 percent of Democratic primary voters( up 5 points since July ), while Warren does 25 percentage( up 6 details ).

x

NEW: NBC News/ Wall street Journal tally: – Biden: 31% (+ 5 since July) – Warren: 25% (+ 6) – Sanders: 14% (+ 1) – Buttigieg: 7%( even) – Harris: 5%( -8) – Yang: 4% (+ 2) – Klobuchar: 2% (+ 1) – Booker: 2% (+ 1) BUT merely 9% say their spirits are definitely made up.

— Alex Seitz-Wald (@ aseitzwald) September 17, 2019

AP :

Don’t vote? The Trump campaign would like a word with you

In Michigan, which Trump carried by 11,000 votes, there is opportunity in places such as the GOP stronghold of Ottawa County west of Grand Rapids. As many as 50,000 eligible voters didn’t cast ballots in 2016, according to an Associated Press analysis of voter data, and Trump won the county by a 2-to-1 margin.

But if Trump’s strategy is to pay off, his allies have a lot more work to do. Between 2016 and 2018, Michigan districts that backed Trump in 2016 included more than 44,000 people who were eligible to vote, but voter enrollments enhanced by really 622 people.

Trump can’t turn out all the eligible voters, and there’s no guarantee that those they do reach will vote for Trump. But the president’s team is potting that producing more voters in will compress more of a perforate than proselytizing the ballot-going faithful.

So Trump is turnout, to hell with exhortation. But…

x

Here’s why the “let’s win without working-class whites” mentality doesn’t hold water for Dems. That demog comprises 45% of all eligible U.S. voters, but: 61% in Wisconsin6 1% in New Hampshire5 6% in Michigan5 6% in Minnesota5 6% in Pennsylvania4 7% in North CarolinaGood luck.

— Dave Wasserman (@ Redistrict) September 16, 2019

x

Dems’ path to beating Trump utterly depends on retaining the incomes they did in diverse, college-educated burbs – the kinds we visualized in 2018& #NC09.But even a modest plummet among white non-college voters could disprove all of it, given the demog’s size& geographic distribution.

— Dave Wasserman (@ Redistrict) September 16, 2019

Philip Bump/ WaPo 😛 TAGEND

A primary 2020 question for Democrats: How critical are working-class white voters?

If that’s the client, why irritant trying to win over those working-class voters?

Wasserman’s point is that degree questions. In precede tweets, he notes that there’s a link between the states that Trump flip-flop in 2016 and the concentration of their working-class white populations.

We can envisage that pretty clearly. As the concentration of working-class whites among the over-1 8 person in a state increased, so did the perimeter by which it preferred Trump in 2016. It’s not a perfect equivalence, but it’s a robust one.

x

This turned out to be the spotlight of the hearing far and away, but it came five hours in, after tv had turned away and floors been mostly written. I hope the committee members will set their egoes aside and make advise qAC/ AEURA( tm) s kick off the hearing next time. https :// t.co/ LyYshP1hHC

— Matthew Miller (@ matthewamiller) September 17, 2019

G Elliott Morris :

Could Donald Trump’s presidency be creating a generation of Democrats? Plus, which 2020 Democrat is closest to the median voter? And will that matter?

Just like these caches stick with us, so too do the postures we are taught. And there is an entire group of young people whose first political remembrances, whose first outlooks, are about Donald Trump. And those positions will stick with them long after he’s gone. Given that the president is so unpopular, I reckon many of those sentiments will be negative.

“But Elliott”, you might be saying, “people’s political preferences change over time! ” That’s rightly remedy, but the aggregate effects of temporal political socialization persist. It’s not so much that parties start out as liberal and flourish to become conservatives, despite what Winston Churchill might have you believe( see below ), but that an age group’s baseline political bents are decided by the political events that occur while they grow up.

“If a man is not a left-wing by the time he is 20, he has no heart. If “hes not” a republican by the time he is 40, he has no brain.” — Winston Churchill

This theory is substantiated by research from political scientists/ statisticians Yair Ghitza and Andrew Gelman. In a 2014 paper named “The Great Society, Reagan’s Revolution and Contemporaries of Presidential Voting” the authors offer empirical indication for the “running tally” theory of political socialization–that is, that people are introduced to political theories over epoch, and “keep score” about their relative pro- or anti-Republican/ Democratic looks until they are “locked-in”. They also is my finding that our youth years are a critical part of this “running tally” process 😛 TAGEND

“The political events bordering the formative years around 14 -2 4 are of paramount importance in structuring life-long presidential voting likings [….] occasions Eem to have created five broad-spectrum generations of voters — voters born in the 1930 s or early( pro-Democrat ); 1941( Republican ); 1952( Democrat ); 1968( Republican ); and the 1980 s or later( Democrat ). ”

x

I said this earlier, but I suppose the most significant development in recent polling is that Warren, while still race far behind Biden , now clearly has a pulse with black voters.







— Steve Kornacki (@ SteveKornacki) September 17, 2019

Alex Burns /NY Times 😛 TAGEND

Warren and Trump Speeches Lay Out Competing Visions of Populism

In New York, Senator Elizabeth Warren described both governments settlement by the influence of the rich. President Trump, in New Mexico, betrayed a “failed liberal establishment.”

The two back-to-back places laid down by the competing versions of populism that could come to define the presidential campaign. From the right, there is the strain Mr. Trump brought to maturity in 2016, combining the longstanding grievances of the grey working class with a newer, darker nervousnes about immigration and cultural change. And on the left, there is a enormously different populist gesticulate still gaining forte, defined in economic terms by Ms. Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, and Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

The letters stressed the possibility that the 2020 election could be the first in a generation to be fought without an ally of either party’s centrist establishment on the ballot. While it is by no means certain that Ms. Warren will emerge as the Democratic campaigner, two of her party’s top three candidates — Ms. Warren and Mr. Sanders — are trumpeting the main theme of fiscal prejudice and promises of sweeping political and social reform.

Hey guys, I don’t think we’ll make KY( although there were good numbersin the Senate race )…

Tony Fabrizio is a GOP pollster who polled for Trump in 2016

…but NC, CO, MN and AZ are looking okay.

WaPo :

Farm bailout fund likely to be included in stopgap spending bill amid adversity from moderate House Democrats

Democrats are likely to include legislation that would expedite payment of these funds as part of a must-pass spending bill as soon as this week.

The beings spoke on the condition of obscurity because they weren’t authorized to discuss internal deliberations.

The provision in question would now ensure the continuation of a multibillion-dollar White House farm bailout program that was at risk of racing short of money. The Washington Post reported last week that House Appropriation Chairwoman Nita M. Lowey( D-N.Y .) was proposing to block the bailout platform as she and other lawmakers worked to finalize a short-term spending bill aimed at preventing a government shutdown Oct. 1.

Lowey and other House Democratic commanders were trying to draft a “clean” spending bill to extend government funding through Nov. 21 without including countless extraneous problems. Nonetheless, a number of moderate House Democrat, including the heads of state of the Agriculture Committee, objected, insisting that the spending bill include language safeguarding the farm bailout platform, which was created last year after complaints from farm groups that Trump’s sell conflict with China was hurting raise country.

A reminder that the tainted Brazilian Bolsinaro brethren( JBS ), among other multinationals are dense in the midst of this, and not all the money goes to American farmers.

WaPo :

Trump is entrust Democrat an opening on its national economy The sell battle and spotty increment are giving Democrats a chance to attack.

Democrats hear developing irritation with Trump’s commercial policy. While Americans primarily agree with Trump that the United States needs to push China to be a better trading partner, merely 35 percent of adults approve of Trump’s handling of trade negotiations with China, according to a Washington Post-ABC News surveytaken this month. Fifty-six percentage of American adults disapprove.

“The president clearly has no strategy, ” said Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Ind ., in the most recent Democratic presidential debate. “I’d like to see him making a is working with[ Chinese President] Xi Jinping. Is it merely me, or was that supposed to happen in, like, April? ”

Strategists am telling the more that Democrat can hold up trade as another example of Trump’s changeable — and economically injurious — behavior, the more their attacks will probably resonate.

Some support here for that, though it’s a single survey in limited commonwealths 😛 TAGEND

x

New poll by Priorities USA presents generic Dem with near double-digit leading over DT in battleground governments hard hit by Trump economy. https :// t.co/ 1b1WwUOmyu

— Mike Klonsky (@ mikeklonsky) September 16, 2019

And now for something dumb 😛 TAGEND

x

Consider the priorities here.Weakening of radiations guidelines is delayed. Staff is struggling to “prepare legal or technical defences for it.”But WH will proceed with punishing CA for now.Trump “wanted to press forward with a programme that they are able to reward California.” https :// t.co/ Lgdkl4HbZF

— Greg Sargent (@ ThePlumLineGS) September 18, 2019

And now for something certainly dumb 😛 TAGEND

x

Why … exactly … why? Who thought it was a good idea to go after an LGBTQ Democratic Senator in a purple district? People have been so blinded by Trump. You know what? We talk a lot about Trumpism as a faith of dogma and not enough about anti-Trumpism as a( yes, lesser) cult.

— G. Elliott Morris (@ gelliottmorris) September 18, 2019

Whatever happened to “don’t do stupid stuff”? This from the Hill 😛 TAGEND

Dan O’Neal, the commonwealth coordinator for Progressive Democrat of America, told the news outlet that the excommunication is an effort to push Sinema back toward the left.

“Here’s the thing: We genuinely backing Kyrsten Sinema, we want her to succeed, we want her to be the best senator in the country, ” O’Neal said. “But the space she is voting is really disappointing. We crave Democrats to vote like Democrats and not Republicans.”

The progressive caucus of the state party delineated its conclude in a resolution.

FiveThirtyEight’s Trump Tracker pointed out that Sinema has defended Trump during her time in the Senate 81 percent of the time. During her time in the House, where she served three calls, she corroborated Trump’s agenda 54% of the time.

Felecia Rotellini, the Arizona Democratic Party’s chairwoman, said the censure will be heard but is unsure it will pass.

How dumb is that? This stupid 😛 TAGEND

Politico :

‘The ground is shifting’: Arizona emerges as a 2020 trouble spot for Trump

Democrats appear to have their best shot at capturing the nation since Bill Clinton won it more than two decades ago

“Can’t Anybody Here Play This Game? ”~ Casey Stengel

x

Corey Lewandowski’s grudging, impudent indication before the House Judiciary Committee may have wound up bolstering Nancy Pelosi’s hands-off approach to impeachment. https :// t.co/ UowKpwRPEe

— Axios (@ axios) September 18, 2019

Apparently not, Casey. Well, would like to congratulate and not back 😛 TAGEND

x

Elizabeth Warren has become the most broadly-acceptable candidate in the Democratic field7 0% of Democratic primary voters say theyAC/ AEURA( tm) re fervent or comfortable with her, while 21% have territories or are uncomfortableBiden: 64%/ 35% Bernie: 62%/ 37% https :// t.co/ yGkWEm1WUK

— John Harwood (@ JohnJHarwood) September 17, 2019

apr

Read more: feeds.dailykosmedia.com







Comments are closed.

error

Enjoy this site? Please spread the word :)