Ronnie Radke Files Restraining Order Against Brittany Furlan Amid Catfishing Claims
January 5, 2026 
0 Comments
Ronnie Radke
Files Restraining Order Against Brittany Furlan
Sorry You Got Catfished, But We Never Dated!!!
Published
|
Updated
Brittany Furlan has persisted with claims she used to be in a relationship with “Falling in Reverse” frontman Ronnie Radke, but he says she got catfished … now he’s filing a temporary restraining order against her, TMZ has learned.
Documents obtained by TMZ show Ronnie filed the TRO Monday in LA Superior Court, citing Brittany harassed him by contacting him multiple times on social media.
Waiting for your permission to load the Instagram Media.
View this post on Instagram
Ronnie alleges when he ignored her messages, Brittany drove to his house and sat out front. Then, he alleges she followed him to a doctor’s appointment and waited outside, just staring at him.
As a result, Ronnie is asking the court to order Brittany to stay at least 100 yards away from him.
TMZ.com
ICYMI — back in May, Brittany claimed she got catfished by someone posing as Ronnie online, leading to major problems with her and her husband, Tommy Lee. Ronnie denied his involvement and told us he contacted the FBI.
But over the weekend, Brittany revisited the drama, seemingly believing she wasn’t actually catfished and insinuated the real Ronnie was behind the numerous Snapchat accounts and telephone numbers that lured her into a romance. Things took an even darker turn when she allegedly contacted some of Ronnie’s underage fans online and encouraged them to come forward with alleged inappropriate experiences with the singer.
TikTok / @brittanyfurlan
The alleged catfishing occurred while Brittany and Tommy were separated, but they’ve since patched things up.
Brittany’s attorney Lou Shapiro tells TMZ … “Ms. Furlan is offended to find out this petition was filed because the only victim of harassment is her. We will take all legal measures to defend against this frivolous lawsuit and request the Ms. Furlan be protected from further harassment and threats by the petitioner.”
