\n<\/p>\n
NEW YORK — <\/span>President Donald Trump must cancel any remaining television commercials paid for with millions of dollars in taxpayer money<\/a> to promote his political message, a federal judge ordered Sunday night, even as the administration said the ad campaign was coming to an end.<\/p>\n U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon in New York sided with a coalition, including the nonpartisan watchdog Common Cause, that challenged the ads and called them an illegal misuse of funds. She told the administration to cancel any remaining ads, including any set to air Sunday night, in granting a temporary restraining order.<\/p>\n \u201cDefendants shall not enter into, renew, or expand any agreement authorizing the development, creation, dissemination, placement, or airing of the challenged advertisements\u201d during the two-week duration of her order, the judge said.<\/p>\n The White House did not immediately respond to an email requesting comment Sunday night. In a court filing late Saturday, the Justice Department argued that the temporary restraining order was unnecessary because \u201cthe alleged offending conduct will end tomorrow.\u201d<\/p>\n The Department of Homeland Security tapped $20 million in taxpayer money<\/a> for the ads. Legal experts have suggested that violated a federal statute against congressionally appropriated money being used for \u201cpublicity or propaganda\u201d and potentially other laws.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are pleased the court acted swiftly to prevent more taxpayer dollars from being used for such blatantly unlawful political propaganda,\u201d the plaintiffs said in a statement issued by Democracy Forward, the nonprofit legal organization that represents them. \u201cThere is no legal justification \u2014 and no precedent \u2014 for the president to use the machinery of the government and funds set aside by Congress for other uses to influence electoral outcomes that further his own agenda.\u201d<\/p>\n In a court declaration Saturday, senior DHS official Holly Mehringer wrote that the money came from funds appropriated by Congress that are \u201cavailable for, among other things, \u2018commemorating efforts and events related to border security.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n The White House has defended the ads as public service announcements akin to what past administrations have done to promote various policies. But the recent ads differ from many past public service announcements because they aren\u2019t aimed at helping members of the public benefit from specific government programs.<\/p>\n The ads, which began airing in late September, glorify Trump and echo his political messaging going into the midterms. One features a clip of Trump talking about the threat of communism and another is a replay of an ad<\/a> from his last presidential campaign. The fifth ad in the campaign began airing Tuesday, focusing on the Trump administration\u2019s capture of Venezuelan leader Nicol\u00e1s Maduro<\/a>.<\/p>\n The use of public funds to pay for the ads drew heavy criticism \u2014 including from some in the GOP. <\/p>\n “It shouldn\u2019t be paid for with taxpayer dollars,\u201d Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told reporters.<\/p>\n The Democratic National Committee has separately sued the Republican administration over the ads.<\/p>\n Amid the backlash Trump said he would start paying for the ads with a campaign account. A White House official said there were no immediate plans to reimburse the government for money already spent.<\/p>\n ___<\/p>\n Johnson reported from Seattle. Associated Press reporters Collin Binkley in Washington and Ali Swenson contributed.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n