\n<\/p>\n
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — <\/span>A federal appeals court has vacated kidnapping convictions in a case involving the death of a 3-year-old boy who went missing from Georgia in 2017 and later turned up dead at a squalid compound in New Mexico.<\/p>\n The boy\u2019s father and other family members were sentenced to life in prison<\/a> in 2024 after jurors convicted them in what prosecutors described as a \u201csick end-of-times scheme.\u201d<\/p>\n A panel of the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals wrote in a decision<\/a> issued Tuesday that there was no evidence of a federal kidnapping crime when the family took the boy, noting that no court order or state law made it illegal for Siraj Ibn Wahhaj to take his son.<\/p>\n The group already was living in New Mexico when a Georgia juvenile court issued a pickup order for the boy after his mother petitioned for emergency custody. The appellate panel took issue with jury instructions that implied the mother’s lack of consent could satisfy the unlawfulness element under the federal kidnapping statute.<\/p>\n \u201cThis instructional error was not harmless,\u201d the panel wrote. \u201cHad the court correctly instructed on the law, the jury couldn\u2019t have found unlawfulness based on the government\u2019s evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n The family members can’t be retried on the kidnapping charges, the panel ruled.<\/p>\n The appeals panel also vacated convictions stemming from accusations that Wahhaj and his brother-in-law were preparing for attacks against the government. It said the two men, who had represented themselves during the trial, had been excluded from bench conferences with the judge about notes jurors had sent during deliberations. <\/p>\n The court remanded that part of the case back to the district court, clearing the way for new trials for the men if prosecutors opt to pursue the case.<\/p>\n \u201cWhat happened at the Taos compound was horrific. We are reviewing the case and assessing what further action may be appropriate,\u201d the U.S. attorney’s office for the district of New Mexico wrote in an email Wednesday.<\/p>\n During the three-week trial in 2023, the defendants suggested that the case was the product of \u201cgovernment overreach\u201d and that they were targeted because they are Muslim.<\/p>\n A fifth defendant \u2014 Jany Leveille, a Haitian national \u2014 avoided the trial by pleading guilty to conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists and being in possession of a firearm while unlawfully in the United States. She was sentenced to 15 years in prison.<\/p>\n Prosecutors alleged that it was under Leveille\u2019s instruction that the family fled Georgia with the boy, ending up in a remote stretch of the high desert where they conducted firearms and tactical training to prepare for attacks against the government. Prosecutors said it was tied to a belief that the boy would be resurrected and then instruct the family which corrupt government and private institutions needed to be eliminated.<\/p>\n