\n<\/p>\n
WASHINGTON — <\/span>President Donald Trump claims that America has increasingly profited from trade with China, largely playing down the tensions over rare earth minerals, tariffs and emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence<\/a> that could rupture relations between the world’s two largest economies.<\/p>\n Trump departs Tuesday for a summit in Beijing<\/a> with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, in what could potentially be the first of four meetings this year.<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019re doing a lot of business with China and making a lot of money,” Trump said last week. “We\u2019re making a lot of money \u2014 it\u2019s different than it used to be.\u201d<\/p>\n The summit is primarily about keeping the economic relationship stable, with only modest policy announcements expected. A trade truce reached last October<\/a> likely will be extended, while China may announce plans to buy American soybeans<\/a>, beef and Boeing airplanes. U.S. officials also have teased the creation of a Board of Trade to keep the sides talking on economic issues.<\/p>\n Some in the Trump administration believe “the outcome that matters more than any set of deliverables is stability and space for continued engagement, both to build domestic resilience and to facilitate future deal-making,” said Brett Fetterly, a managing principal at the consultancy The Asia Group who focuses on China.<\/p>\n Engagement would only be the first step toward addressing the competition between the U.S. and China<\/a>, as tit-for-tat tariffs<\/a>, the AI and electric vehicle buildout<\/a>, and the Iran war<\/a> could upend relations.<\/p>\n Despite Trump’s claims about making money, China bought nearly $50 billion less in American products last year than it did in 2022, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.<\/p>\n Some of that decrease reflects Beijing stopping soybean purchases<\/a> during last year’s trade war. The Trump administration has made clear that it wants to support American farmers<\/a> and factories by having China import more from the U.S., with the goal of further narrowing a trade imbalance that totaled $202 billion last year.<\/p>\n The United States also now imports more goods from Taiwan than China, a change provoked in part by the AI race that has U.S. firms buying computer chips and servers from the self-governing island<\/a>. <\/p>\n But going back to Trump’s first term, China also began to route its U.S.-bound products through other Asian countries, while American companies shifted supply chains for computers and other electronics to Vietnam and India.<\/p>\n China’s share of goods<\/a> imported to the U.S. has fallen from 22% at the start of Trump\u2019s first term in 2017 to just 7.5% in the first three months of this year, according to government data analyzed by Chad Bown, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and co-author of the book \u201cHow to Win a Trade War.\u201d<\/p>\n U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has said he \u201chighlighted\u201d in an April 30 call with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng the value of a \u201cnew government-to-government Board of Trade.\u201d<\/p>\n Greer indicated the board could improve trade in goods without national security concerns. That could mean agricultural products, for instance, but not computer chips or other sensitive technology.<\/p>\n The initiative could make it easier to resolve trade disputes<\/a> and help American efforts to sell more to China. It might help prevent a repeat of last year when Trump hiked tariff rates on Chinese goods<\/a> by 145%, before finalizing a truce<\/a> in an October meeting with Xi in South Korea.<\/p>\n The board also would give the Trump administration an alternative to severe tariff hikes, which have become a logistical and legal problem. The Supreme Court ruled that Trump lacked the authority<\/a> to unilaterally impose many of last year’s tariffs, while his temporary replacement tariffs that followed were deemed illegal by a federal court<\/a> last week.<\/p>\n The Trump administration says the U.S. and China would need to get sign-off at home to create the board that could manage tens of billions of dollars in trade. Administration officials also would like to create an investment forum to discuss financing of operations in each country.<\/p>\n Traveling to China as part of the U.S. delegation are some 17 CEOs, including Tesla’s Elon Musk, Apple’s Tim Cook and Boeing’s Kelly Ortberg, the White House says.<\/p>\n In some ways, Trump’s and Xi’s governments have been talking past each other. Trump assumes America can keep its edge on AI<\/a>, so he judges the trade imbalance as the big issue to solve. But Xi sees a world disrupted by climate change and the Iran war, shifts that could give a boost to Chinese technologies<\/a> such as solar panels and EVs.<\/p>\n \u201cWashington and Beijing are competing at different levels and different domains, with different theories of victory,\u201d said Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow specializing in U.S.-China relations at the Hudson Institute, a conservative think tank. \u201cPresident Trump leveraged tariffs not as a weapon against China but as leverage to secure a trade deal. Xi Jinping is angling to win a cold war with the United States.”<\/p>\n The U.S.-Israel war against Iran also is leading to an inflection point on energy, said Ali Wyne, a senior research and advocacy adviser on U.S.-China relations at the International Crisis Group. <\/p>\n The Trump administration is banking on the world continuing to rely on oil and natural gas, whereas China sees the price spikes<\/a> following the disruption to energy shipments<\/a> in the Strait of Hormuz<\/a> as supporting a green energy transition that favors its industrial strategy.<\/p>\n \u201cThe structural frictions between the United States and China, they are growing in number and severity,\u201d Wyne said.<\/p>\n Several potential strains could easily upset the cheery talk of friendship \u2014 raising questions about whether any meaningful progress can be made at the summit on issues like:<\/p>\n \u2014 China’s control of the majority of rare earth mining and almost all of the processing for those minerals widely needed for electronics. The Trump administration is trying to develop its own rare earths production<\/a> with new partnerships and investments in companies, a strategy that would unfold over several years.<\/p>\n \u2014 The U.S. push to limit China’s access<\/a> to the most advanced computer chips. These chips, designed by companies such as Nvidia and AMD, have the processing power to further develop AI.<\/p>\n \u2014 China’s dominance as an automaker<\/a>. Its worldwide exports of vehicles increased 21% last year, according to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers. China can sell EVs at a much cheaper price than automakers in the U.S., Germany, Italy, Japan and South Korea.<\/p>\n \u2014 Tariffs. After the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s tariffs, the administration launched national security investigations under a provision of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose new tariffs<\/a> based on excess industrial capacity and efforts to prevent slave labor that could potentially withstand legal scrutiny.<\/p>\n