{"id":351043,"date":"2026-04-13T00:18:56","date_gmt":"2026-04-13T05:18:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.etrafficlane.com\/60dollarmiracle\/tasha-k-promised-to-stop-talking-about-cardi-b-cardis-lawyers-say-she-broke-it-in-a-month"},"modified":"2026-04-13T00:19:01","modified_gmt":"2026-04-13T05:19:01","slug":"tasha-k-promised-to-stop-talking-about-cardi-b-cardis-lawyers-say-she-broke-it-in-a-month","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.etrafficlane.com\/60dollarmiracle\/tasha-k-promised-to-stop-talking-about-cardi-b-cardis-lawyers-say-she-broke-it-in-a-month","title":{"rendered":"Tasha Ok Promised To Cease Speaking About Cardi B. Cardi’s Attorneys Say She Broke It in a Month"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

A month. That is how long the deal lasted.<\/p>\n

In March 2025, a bankruptcy court approved a structured repayment plan<\/a> that gave Tasha K \u2014 real name Latasha Kebe \u2014 a manageable path out of the $3.9 million defamation judgment Cardi B won against her in 2022. The terms were simple. Pay $20,000 a month. Stop making defamatory or disparaging statements about Cardi B and her family. In return, Cardi\u2019s legal team agreed to delay collection efforts.<\/p>\n

Kebe took the deal. Then, according to a motion filed Friday<\/a> by Cardi\u2019s attorneys and reported by Rolling Stone, she started breaking it almost immediately.<\/p>\n

\"Bloods\"\"Cardi
Credit: Tasha K\/Instagram<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Twenty-Four Violations and Counting<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Cardi\u2019s lawyers say they documented more than two dozen violations of the non-disparagement clause after the agreement was confirmed. The filing describes what it calls a \u201crelentless course of conduct\u201d involving \u201cthinly coded references, scantily veiled commentary, and strategic provocation\u201d aimed at Kebe\u2019s audience of more than a million followers.<\/p>\n

Some of the posts allegedly referenced Cardi\u2019s ex, Offset. Others touched on her alleged rivalry with Nicki Minaj. The lawyers say they warned Kebe and her attorney multiple times. The warnings did not work. According to Rolling Stone, Kebe posted comments about Offset multiple times in the past week alone, including less than an hour before Cardi\u2019s legal team filed the motion.<\/p>\n

Less than an hour. She was allegedly still doing it while the paperwork to stop her was being printed.<\/p>\n

\n

( #AD<\/a> ) \u2013 #TashaK<\/a> Breaks Down WHY #LilTjay<\/a> Allegedly Shooting #Offset<\/a> In The Booty \u203c\ufe0f\ud83d\udc40\ud83d\udea8 pic.twitter.com\/FaLj1agNRw<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Tasha K (@UNWINEWITHTASHA) April 10, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

She Said the Quiet Part Out Loud. Again.<\/strong><\/h2>\n

According to the filing, Kebe has publicly stated that she intends to resume her attacks on Cardi B once the debt is fully paid off. Not privately. Not in a sealed deposition. On her platform, on the record.<\/p>\n

Read that again. She allegedly told the world she is only stopping temporarily, not because she was wrong, not because a jury said what she published was defamatory, invasive, and intentionally distressing, but because she currently owes money. The implication is clear: once the bill is settled, the content machine restarts.<\/p>\n

That doesn\u2019t sound like remorse. That is a business plan with a countdown timer.<\/p>\n

Cardi\u2019s team put it bluntly in the filing: \u201cDebtor still believes that she is above the law, consequences, and is invulnerable.\u201d They are asking the judge to impose \u201ceconomically painful\u201d sanctions \u2014 penalties harsh enough that violating the deal costs more than the content earns.<\/p>\n

The GoFundMe Makes This Even Worse<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Remember, this is the same woman who launched a GoFundMe campaign<\/a> in March asking strangers to donate $3.5 million to help her pay off the Cardi B judgment. She said she wanted to \u201cmove forward and focus on creating, reporting, and entertaining without constant interruption.\u201d<\/p>\n

We wrote about that campaign when it launched<\/a>. On March 7, the fundraiser showed just over $8,400 against a $3.5 million goal. As of Saturday, it was sitting at roughly $15,400, which means the internet has not exactly sprinted to bail her out.<\/p>\n

\"fundraiser\"\"Latasha
Credit: GoFundMe<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

So the timeline looks like this: Kebe asks the public to fund her debt. The public mostly declines. Meanwhile, Cardi\u2019s lawyers say she keeps violating the agreement that made the debt manageable. And she is still monetizing the controversy through birthday promotions, branded merchandise, classes, and the attention her social media posts keep generating.<\/p>\n

She built a career selling access to other people\u2019s pain. She lost a lawsuit over it. She got a payment plan. Cardi\u2019s lawyers say she broke the payment plan\u2019s one major condition. And now she is asking the internet to cover the cost while she keeps doing the thing that created the cost.<\/p>\n

\"Lawyer\"\"Nicki
Credit: Cardi B via Instagram<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

That line from the original trial matters more now than it did then. Because the argument this behavior makes \u2014 whether Kebe intends it or not \u2014 is that Cardi\u2019s suffering was a business expense. Something to be absorbed, monetized, and repeated once the invoice clears.<\/p>\n

A federal jury already said what Kebe published was false. The jury held her liable for defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The appeals court upheld the verdict. The bankruptcy court structured a repayment plan. And according to this new filing, none of it was enough to make her stop.<\/p>\n

Cardi\u2019s lawyers are now asking a judge to do what warnings, a jury verdict, a failed appeal, and a bankruptcy settlement could not: make Tasha K feel a consequence she actually respects.<\/p>\n

The question for the court is straightforward. Is Kebe unable to stop, or does she simply not believe anyone will make her? Either way, the next ruling will tell us whether \u201ceconomically painful\u201d means anything \u2014 or whether the only economy that matters to Tasha K is the one where attention always pays more than compliance.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n