\n<\/p>\n
COLUMBUS, Ohio — <\/span>In rain, snow and bitter cold, a steady drumbeat of small protests have been held in recent months on the Ohio State University main campus with a single goal in mind: removing billionaire retail mogul Les Wexner’s name from buildings where it’s emblazoned. <\/p>\n At issue \u2014 for union nurses at OSU’s Wexner Medical Center, for former athletes at the Les Wexner Football Complex, and for some student leaders who may walk past the Wexner Center for the Arts near the campus oval \u2014 is Wexner’s well-documented association<\/a> with the late sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein<\/a>.<\/p>\n Similar cries are arising over a Wexner-named building at Harvard University and others around the country named for different Epstein associates, including Steve Tisch<\/a>, Casey Wasserman<\/a>, Glenn Dubin<\/a> and Howard Lutnick<\/a>.<\/p>\n It’s all part of the backlash across higher education<\/a> against figures with ties to Epstein, who cultivated an extensive network including powerful people in the arts, business and academia. Scrutiny has landed on university donors as well as several academics whose emails with Epstein surfaced in the latest files, including some who have resigned<\/a>.<\/p>\n Wexner hasn’t been charged with any crime in connection with Epstein, the one-time financial adviser by whom he says he was \u201cduped.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n But a group of former Ohio State athletes who survived a sweeping sexual abuse scandal at the school<\/a> argues that the retired L Brands founder<\/a> ‘s generosity to his alma mater is now tainted by the knowledge that Epstein was entangled in many of his family’s spending decisions, including around the football complex’s naming. <\/p>\n \u201cOhio State University cannot credibly separate itself from these facts, nor can it justify continuing to honor Les Wexner with an athletic facility,\u201d their naming removal request read. It went on, \u201cTo do so is to ignore the voices of survivors, former athletes, and the broader community who expect accountability, transparency, and moral leadership.\u201d<\/p>\n At Harvard, a group of students and faculty at the prestigious Kennedy School has targeted the Leslie H. Wexner Building and the Wexner-Sunshine Lobby. The renaming request submitted in March cites Wexner\u2019s \u201cstrong ties to Epstein\u201d and argues Epstein profited off Wexner, \u201cwhich enabled Epstein to use his wealth and power to traffic and abuse children and women.\u201d<\/p>\n Some Harvard students and alumni also want the Farkas name removed from Farkas Hall, which hosts the Hasty Pudding Theatricals Man and Woman of the Year<\/a>. The building was renamed in 2011 following a significant donation from Andrew Farkas, graduate chairman of the Hasty Pudding Institute, in honor of his father. <\/p>\n Farkas had a longtime personal and business relationship with Epstein, including co-owning a marina with him in the Caribbean. He also repeatedly asked Epstein to donate to Hasty Pudding. Between roughly 2013 and 2019, Epstein regularly donating $50,000 annually to secure top-tier donor status, for a total of more than $300,000.<\/p>\n \u201cAs I\u2019ve said repeatedly, I deeply regret ever having met this individual, but at no time have I conducted myself inappropriately,\u201d Farkas said in a statement.<\/p>\n Pushback against buildings named for Epstein associates is growing on some U.S. campuses. <\/p>\n Just last weekend, the student body at Haverford College in Pennsylvania voted to urge President Wendy Raymond to forge ahead with the renaming process for the Allison & Howard Lutnick<\/a> Library. The building is named for the U.S. commerce secretary who has faced resignation calls<\/a> over his relationship with Epstein.<\/p>\n Raymond had said in a February open letter<\/a> that she wasn’t ready to do that. In a statement to The Associated Press following Sunday\u2019s vote, Raymond said she respected the process and would respond to the resolution within the customary 30-day period.<\/p>\n At Ohio State, pleas against the Wexner name are making their way through a five-step review procedure<\/a>, most of which takes place outside public view and with no set timeline. The university’s new president, Ravi Bellamkonda said, \u201cI think the process is thorough, fair, and open, and I will promise you that we will give each request a full consideration.\u201d<\/p>\n A spokesman for Harvard confirmed the school has received the Wexner-related name removal request but would not comment further. It would be the university’s second name change, after the John Winthrop House, which bore the name of a Harvard professor and a like-named ancestor, was changed to Winthrop House in July over their connections to slavery.<\/p>\n Tufts University, home to the Tisch Library and the Steve Tisch<\/a> Sports and Fitness Center, said it continues to look at the matter. The library has moved to clarify that it was not named for Steve, but, in 1992, for his father Preston Tisch, an honored alum. The sports center removed a set of Steve Tisch’s handprints during spring break. The university said that was part of a planned renovation.<\/p>\n UCLA’s Wasserman<\/a> Football Center and Stony Brook University’s Dubin<\/a> Family Athletic Performance Center also are named for Epstein associates. <\/p>\n The current clamor bears some resemblance to the controversy that surrounded the wealthy Sackler family’s culpability<\/a> in the deadly opioid crisis, because in both cases the institutions involved had received vast sums<\/a> from the family. <\/p>\n Some major institutions \u2014 including museums in New York and Paris, Tufts and the University of Oxford in England \u2014 did remove the Sackler name, but Harvard chose not to. In a 15-page report explaining its 2024 decision, the university said the legacy of Arthur M. Sackler, whose company Purdue Pharma made the potent opioid OxyContin, was \u201ccomplex, ambiguous and debatable.\u201d<\/p>\n The Epstein associates whose names are on campus buildings also are typically generous donors, as well as alumni.<\/p>\n Wexner, his wife Abigail and their charities have given Ohio State well over $200 million over the years, for example. That included $100 million to benefit the Wexner Medical Center; at least $15 million for the Wexner Center, a contemporary art museum named for Wexner’s father, Harry; and $5 million split with an Epstein-run foundation toward construction of the football complex. The Wexners have given another $42 million to the Harvard Kennedy School.<\/p>\n Anne Bergeron, a museum consultant and author who specializes in the ethics of building naming rights in the cultural sector, said universities are serious about their gift acceptance standards while also recognizing that the conduct of individual donors may be judged differently over time. <\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s no surprise that a lot of these situations arise within the university sphere, because with students \u2014 especially the younger generation \u2014 there is virtually no tolerance for being associated with anyone who doesn\u2019t represent the best of humanity,\u201d she said<\/p>\n She called this \u201ca moment of reckoning\u201d for universities and said they have to guard against the appearance of a quid pro quo in their building namings.<\/p>\n Michael Oser, a Columbus-area resident, articulated the frustration of some defenders of retaining the Wexner name in a recent letter-to-the-editor of The Columbus Dispatch.<\/p>\n \u201cOSU took the money. Built the buildings. Cut the ribbons. Smiled for the photos There were no formal \u2018morality clauses\u2019 attached back then, just gratitude and applause,\u201d he wrote. \u201cNow, years later, some want to play moral referee while the university keeps the cash and the concrete. That\u2019s not accountability. That\u2019s convenience.\u201d<\/p>\n Lauren Barnes, a student in the Kennedy School’s master’s program leading the effort to remove Wexner’s name, said she struggles most days as a survivor of sexual abuse and the mother of a 14-year-old to walk into a building with a name linked to Epstein. <\/p>\n \u201cThinking about all the children in this world that deserve safety and also all the survivors on campus that have to walk under the Wexner name, I know what that\u2019s like to have my heart race and my hands get sweaty,\u201d she said. \u201cI hate that anyone else has to have that feeling walking under that name and just dealing with it kind of everywhere on campus.\u201d<\/p>\n One protester at Ohio State, Audrey Brill, told a local ABC affiliate that it now \u201cfeels gross\u201d thinking of women delivering babies at OSU’s Wexner Medical Center \u201cgiven everything that we\u2019re learning about where this money went\u201d \u2014 and she feels removing Wexner’s name could help. <\/p>\n Some protesters also want the name of Dr. Mark Landon, a prominent Ohio State gynecologist who received five-figure quarterly payments from Epstein between 2001 and 2005, removed from a visitor\u2019s lounge in the hospital\u2019s new $2 billion, 26-story tower. Landon have said the money was for biotech investment consulting for Wexner, not health care for Epstein or any of his victims.<\/p>\n ___ <\/p>\n Casey contributed from Boston.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n