\n<\/p>\n
WASHINGTON — <\/span>The Supreme Court on Friday revived a lawsuit from an evangelical Christian barred from demonstrating in Mississippi after authorities say he shouted insults at people over a loudspeaker.<\/p>\n The high court unanimously ruled in the case of Gabriel Olivier, who says his religious and free speech rights were violated when he was arrested for refusing to move his preaching away from a suburban amphitheater. The city said he had shouted insults like \u201cwhores,\u201d \u201cJezebel,\u201d and \u201cnasty\u201d at people, sometimes holding signs showing aborted fetuses. <\/p>\n Olivier wanted to challenge the law as an unconstitutional restriction on free speech, but lower courts stopped him from suing because he’d been convicted of breaking it. A Supreme Court case from the 1990s found people can\u2019t use civil lawsuits to undermine criminal convictions. <\/p>\n But Olivier\u2019s lawyers said he only wanted to block future enforcement of the measure. They said he was demonstrating peacefully when he was arrested for refusing to move to a designated \u201cprotest zone.” The legal principle, they argued, affects free-speech cases across the political spectrum. <\/p>\n The decision clears a path for him to file a civil-rights lawsuit, though it doesn\u2019t guarantee an eventual win. Local governments have said that a ruling for Olivier could have wide repercussions by allowing a rush of new lawsuits against cities and towns. <\/p>\n The city of Brandon has said the restrictions weren’t about religion, and he had plenty of other legal avenues to challenge the law. The ordinance restricting Olivier to a designated \u201cprotest zone” has already survived another lawsuit, city attorneys said. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n