\n<\/p>\n
NASHVILLE, Tenn. — <\/span>Three teenagers in Tennessee sued Elon Musk’s xAI this week, claiming the company’s image-generation tools were used to morph real photos<\/a> of them into explicitly sexual images. <\/p>\n The high school students, who are seeking to proceed under pseudonyms, filed the lawsuit in California, where xAI \u2014 Musk’s artificial intelligence company \u2014 has its headquarters. They are seeking class-action status in order to represent what the lawsuit says are thousands of victims like themselves who either are minors or were minors when sexually explicit images of them were created. <\/p>\n According to the lawsuit, Jane Doe 1 was alerted anonymously in December that someone was distributing sexually explicit images of her on a social media website. <\/p>\n \u201cAt least five of these files, one video and four images, depicted her actual face and body in settings with which she was familiar, but morphed into sexually explicit poses,” the lawsuit states. It claims the person distributing the images knew Doe and used xAI’s image generation tools to turn real photos of her into sexually abusive ones. One of the images was taken from a homecoming photo. Another was taken from a high school yearbook. <\/p>\n The person distributing the images also created explicit images of at least 18 other girls, two of whom are co-plaintiffs in the lawsuit. In late December, local police arrested the perpetrator and confiscated his phone. They found that he had uploaded the images to several platforms where he traded them for sexually explicit images of other minors. <\/p>\n Other AI companies have prohibited their image-generators from producing any sexually explicit content, even of adults. Musk saw this as a business opportunity and promoted the ability of xAI’s Grok chatbot to create \u201cspicy\u201d content, the lawsuit claims. However, there is currently no way to prevent the generation of explicit images of adults while completely blocking the generation of images of children, the lawsuit claims. It also claims that xAI knew Grok would be able to produce sexually explicit images<\/a> of children but released it anyway. <\/p>\n The lawsuit claims the person who distributed images of the plaintiffs used an application that licensed the xAI technology or \u201cotherwise purchased its access to Grok, and was used as a cut-out or middleman.\u201d<\/p>\n