\n<\/p>\n
WASHINGTON — <\/span>Less than a week after the Supreme Court<\/a> struck down President Donald Trump’s<\/a> global tariffs, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul<\/a> listened as one of the plaintiffs in the case recounted the financial toll of the levies on his wine importing business.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is a heavy tax and you have to pay it up front,\u201d Victor Schwartz, the owner of VOS Selections, told Hochul as they walked alongside bottles of wine he imports from 16 countries. <\/p>\n As Hochul seeks reelection<\/a> this year, she says the impact of Trump’s tariffs is a \u201ccenterpiece\u201d of her message. She has pressed the administration to issue a $13.5 billion tariff refund to New Yorkers following the Supreme Court decision. And she released an ad this week criticizing her Republican challenger, Bruce Blakeman<\/a>, for supporting the levies and attending the White House event<\/a> where Trump unveiled them with a massive board listing the rate for each country.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is a lethal issue for Republicans this November,\u201d Hochul said in an interview. \u201cYou can be sure we’re going to make sure people know who did this to them.\u201d<\/p>\n She’s not alone. Democrats running for governor across the country are making tariffs central to their pitch to voters. They’re betting that in an election year dominated by issues ranging from immigration<\/a> to the war in Iran<\/a>, rising costs connected to the tariffs will be a motivating issue for many voters. <\/p>\n \u201cThat picture of (Trump) with the tariff board is going to be front and center in every single one of our campaigns,\u201d Gov. Andy Beshear<\/a> of Kentucky, who is leading the Democratic Governors Association this year, said in an interview.<\/p>\n White House spokesman Kush Desai countered that \u201cwhat Democrats are really running against are President Trump\u2019s Most-Favored-Nations deals to slash prescription drug prices by up to 90 percent, trillions in investments to bring manufacturing back to America, and new trade deals that level the playing field for American workers.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cAll of these historic victories were possible because of tariffs.\u201d<\/p>\n Republicans are entering a challenging election year as they contend with voter anxiety around spiking prices \u2014 an issue Trump pledged to fix during his 2024 campaign \u2014 and the record of a president’s party losing ground during the midterms.<\/p>\n Much of the focus has been on Congress, where Democrats are just a few seats shy of taking the House majority. But the party is also aiming to regain ground outside Washington as they hope to hold onto governorships in Arizona, Michigan and Wisconsin and eye GOP-held seats in Nevada, Georgia and Iowa. <\/p>\n In interviews this week, Democrats running in some of those states said tariffs and the broader issue of affordability will be at the forefront of their agenda. <\/p>\n In Nevada, state Attorney General Aaron Ford sued the administration over its initial round of tariffs and is suing again as Trump seeks to revive them. As he seeks the Democratic nomination to take on Republican incumbent Gov. Joe Lombardo<\/a>, Ford called the tariffs \u201cillegal\u201d and blamed them for restaurant closures and fewer visitors to his tourism-dependent state. <\/p>\n \u201cTariffs are at the very top of the conversation because Nevadans every single day are feeling the impacts,\u201d Ford said. <\/p>\n In Arizona<\/a>, Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs<\/a> is seeking reelection in a state Trump won by more than 5 percentage points in 2024 with a focus on costs. She criticized GOP Reps. Andy Biggs and David Schweikert, who are vying for the nomination to challenge her, for \u201ccheering on these reckless tariffs.\u201d Both lawmakers voted against<\/a> a measure last month to end the national emergency Trump declared to impose tariffs on Canada. <\/p>\n Hobbs said the cost concern was about more than tariffs, noting Medicaid cuts, rising health costs and a spike in gas prices in the wake of the war in Iran.<\/p>\n \u201cThey\u2019re being hit everywhere,\u201d she said. <\/p>\n Republicans largely reject the tariff criticism and are trying to turn the anxiety about affordability back on Democrats, especially in high-cost states where they already govern. Blakeman, for instance, said in a statement that Hochul is \u201csolely responsible for the affordability crisis in New York, with crushing electric bills, soaring insurance rates and the highest taxes in America.\u201d<\/p>\n In an interview, Schweikert argued that \u201cit was only a few years ago in a previous administration that the Democrats actually liked tariffs. So this seems to be if Trump’s for it, they’re against it.\u201d <\/p>\n Trump, for his part, hasn\u2019t given up on the tariffs. After calling the Supreme Court\u2019s decision \u201c unfortunate<\/a>,\u201d his administration is scrambling to find ways to revive the levies. The president has already announced a 10% tariff using a different mechanism, a move that\u2019s facing legal challenges, and wants to further raise tariffs to 15%.<\/p>\n But Trump\u2019s prediction of a manufacturing renaissance that would result from companies making more products in the U.S. to avoid tariffs has not materialized<\/a>. During the first year of his second term, 98,000 manufacturing jobs were lost. Revenue from tariffs is doing little to reduce the federal deficit, which is projected to climb over the next decade.<\/p>\n Polling suggests unease about the dramatic way Trump has imposed the levies. In January, before the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling, about 6 in 10 U.S. adults said Trump went too far in imposing new tariffs and using presidential power, an AP-NORC poll<\/a> found. <\/p>\n Now Republicans are trying to balance acknowledging the public’s concern without antagonizing Trump, who remains popular among the GOP base. <\/p>\n Lombardo’s response to a question about tariffs last year in a local television interview has given Democrats persistent fodder. The governor said, \u201cWe need to maybe feel a little pain in the short term and hopefully in the long term it\u2019s a huge benefit for us.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019re feeling it,\u201d Ford said of the pain, \u201cand Nevadans are ready for new leadership.\u201d<\/p>\n In a statement, Drew Galang, Lombardo\u2019s communications director, said that \u201cwhile the governor cannot control federal trade policy, he has prioritized policies to drive growth in Nevada \u2014 diversifying the state\u2019s economy, cutting red tape, and attracting billions of dollars of business investments.\u201d<\/p>\n