\n<\/p>\n
WASHINGTON — <\/span>The Senate passed a broad bill on Thursday to make U.S. housing more accessible and affordable, a rare bipartisan effort in Congress to address a growing national problem.<\/p>\n The bill, which passed 89-10, would reduce regulations, regulate corporate investors and expand how housing dollars can be used to build affordable homes and rentals. It will now head back to the House, which passed a similar bill earlier this year. <\/p>\n \u201cWe have a housing shortage all across America,\u201d said Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who worked with Republicans to win overwhelming support from both parties for the legislation. \u201cWe need more housing of every kind. More housing for first-time home buyers, more housing for renters, more housing for seniors, more housing for people with disabilities, more rural housing, more urban housing, more, more, and more.” <\/p>\n The legislation, she said “will help drive down prices.\u201d<\/p>\n Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott, R-S.C., led the effort with Warren. He said ahead of the vote that the Senate could \u201cdo what so many people failed to do in this legislative body for the last few decades, and that is pass consequential legislation that makes it easier to become a homeowner.\u201d <\/p>\n Despite the overwhelming bipartisan vote in the Senate, It\u2019s unclear whether the House will pass the legislation again \u2014 or if President Donald Trump will sign it. <\/p>\n Trump has strongly backed the bill through the bipartisan negotiations, but he has also slowed its momentum with a declaration last weekend that he won\u2019t sign any new measures unless Congress passes legislation that would require voters to show proof of citizenship<\/a> and end most mail-in balloting. The Senate is expected to begin consideration of that bill next week, but it is unlikely to pass as all Democrats oppose it. <\/p>\n At the same time, House leaders have indicated that they are unlikely to accept the Senate version of the housing legislation and have suggested they could launch a formal conference process to negotiate a final deal between the chambers \u2014 a process that could take months. <\/p>\n Senate Majority Leader John Thune said ahead of the bill\u2019s passage on Thursday that conference negotiations are a possibility, \u201cbut obviously the quickest way to do this would be to pick up the Senate bill and pass it.\u201d<\/p>\n If the White House wants that to happen, he said, \u201cthey\u2019ll probably have to make that argument to House leadership.\u201d<\/p>\n The bill would give local governments more power on housing issues, allow banks to invest more in affordable housing and lift limits on the number of units in a public housing development that can receive private financing through Section 8 funding that helps rehabilitate properties.<\/p>\n \u201cYou\u2019ve got many provisions in this bill that stop treating the U.S. like one single housing market and start giving local leaders the tools they need to fix their unique regional puzzle,\u201d said Peter Carroll with Cotality, a company that tracks housing data.<\/p>\n The bill aims to make homebuilding easier by streamlining some regulations that require environmental reviews and inspections. It also eliminates a limit on a grant for emergency shelter beds and street homelessness outreach.<\/p>\n As many affordable housing developers are leaning on manufactured and modular homes<\/a> that can be transported to areas that need housing, the legislation also lifts the requirement that they have to be built on a permanent chassis, making them easier to build and design.<\/p>\n Housing advocacy and policy groups say they wish the bill went further by investing money in building more housing and assisting renters.<\/p>\n \u201cThis legislation is the product of essentially senators and House members wanting to come up with something that could pass with both Democratic and Republican votes, which means it\u2019s inherently less ambitious,\u201d said Yonah Freemark, a researcher at Urban Institute.<\/p>\n One of the more contested provisions of the bill would bar institutional investors from buying single-family homes \u2014 a top priority for Trump. <\/p>\n The bill defines such investors as any that directly or indirectly own 350 or more single-family homes. Investors of any size would not be required to sell single-family homes bought before the date that the bill becomes a law.<\/p>\n They would still be allowed to buy or build single-family homes if they rent them out, but would be required to sell them to an individual homebuyer after seven years and offer that buyer \u201cprice concessions\u201d and give tenants a 30-day \u201cfirst-look\u201d period when the time comes to sell the home.<\/p>\n The U.S. housing market has been in a slump dating back to 2022, when mortgage rates began to climb from pandemic-era lows.<\/p>\n Sales of previously occupied U.S. homes have been hovering close to a 4-million annual pace now going back to 2023 \u2014 well short of the 5.2-million annual pace that\u2019s historically been the norm. They slowed last year to a 30-year low and<\/a> have remained sluggish so far this year, declining in January<\/a> and February<\/a> versus a year earlier.<\/p>\n A sharp run-up in home prices, especially in the early years of this decade, and a chronic shortage of homes nationally worsened by years of below-average home construction have left many aspiring homeowners priced out of the market.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, while the median U.S. monthly rent has been declining for more than two years, it was still 15.2% higher in January than it was at the start of 2020, according to data from Realtor.com.<\/p>\n The trends have ratcheted pressure on lawmakers this year, with midterm elections looming in November, to show they\u2019re working on ways to make homeownership and rental housing costs more affordable.<\/p>\n ___<\/p>\n Kramon reported from Atlanta and Veiga reported from Los Angeles. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n