Jamieson Greer,<\/a> in a Wednesday call with reporters, said he didn\u2019t want to prejudge the outcome of the process.<\/p>\n\u201cThe policy remains the same \u2014 the tools may change depending on, you know, the vagaries of courts and other things,” said Greer, stressing that the goal was to protect American jobs.<\/p>\n
The start of the process to fully replace Trump\u2019s prior tariffs could invite a return of much of the drama that rattled the global economy last year. The since-overturned tariffs led to new frameworks with U.S. trade partners \u2014 and it\u2019s unclear what impact a new set of import taxes could have on those agreements. Greer described the trade frameworks as standing on their own and suggested they were separate from the new investigation.<\/p>\n
This new set of tariffs could play out against the backdrop of a war in Iran and midterm elections in which Democrats are running against Trump\u2019s Republican allies by emphasizing that the public is owed tariff refunds following the Supreme Court decision.<\/p>\n
Greer said that the investigation would examine excess industrial capacity and government backing that could give foreign companies an unfair advantage over U.S. companies.<\/p>\n
The entities subject to the investigation include China, the European Union, Singapore, Switzerland, Norway, Indonesia, Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, South Korea, Vietnam, the self-governing island of Taiwan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Japan and India. The government is looking for what it deems to be persistent trade surpluses with the U.S. and policies such as subsidies and the suppression of workers’ wages, among other factors.<\/p>\n
The administration is also rolling out a Section 301 investigation to ban the importing of goods made by forced labor.<\/p>\n
Greer indicated that there could be additional Section 301 investigations over issues such as digital service taxes, pharmaceutical drug pricing and ocean pollution, among other possibilities. The Commerce Department has separate trade investigations under Section 232 of the 1962 Trade Expansion Act.<\/p>\n
There are timeline pressures for the administration to complete its investigations. The administration has imposed 10% tariffs on foreign-made goods under section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, but those expire after 150 days on July 24. Trump said he planned to raise that import tax to 15%, but he has yet to do so.<\/p>\n
Greer said the administration is \u201ckeying off\u201d the new investigation based on the 150-day deadline, saying that the goal is to bring \u201cpotential options\u201d to Trump as soon as possible.<\/p>\n
Greer said the investigations would be separate from the trade frameworks announced last year by Trump that set baseline tariff rates, which led to 15% rates charged on goods from the European Union, Japan and South Korea, among other places, that have since been overturned by the Supreme Court. Still, he suggested that the frameworks could play a factor.<\/p>\n
\u201cMy sense is that these countries continue to want to deal, and President Trump continues to want the deal,\u201d Greer said, adding that since tariffs are in play the commitments that the countries have made and the implementation of the frameworks would be considered as they \u201cbump\u201d against the demands of the Section 301 process.<\/p>\n
___<\/p>\n
AP writer Mae Anderson contributed to this report.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"WASHINGTON — The Trump administration on Wednesday opened a new trade investigation into manufacturing in foreign countries \u2014 an effort that comes after the Supreme […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":344212,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[17772,1913,9104,964,130,1839,6832,124,4067,2548,4914],"class_list":["post-344209","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-commerce-division","tag-federal-government","tag-indonesia","tag-insurance-policies","tag-japan","tag-norway","tag-supreme-court","tag-switzerland","tag-taiwan","tag-thailand","tag-trump-administration"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.etrafficlane.com\/60dollarmiracle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344209","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.etrafficlane.com\/60dollarmiracle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.etrafficlane.com\/60dollarmiracle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etrafficlane.com\/60dollarmiracle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etrafficlane.com\/60dollarmiracle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=344209"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.etrafficlane.com\/60dollarmiracle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344209\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":344211,"href":"https:\/\/www.etrafficlane.com\/60dollarmiracle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344209\/revisions\/344211"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etrafficlane.com\/60dollarmiracle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/344212"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.etrafficlane.com\/60dollarmiracle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=344209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etrafficlane.com\/60dollarmiracle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=344209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.etrafficlane.com\/60dollarmiracle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=344209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}