\n<\/p>\n
Chronic exposure to pollution<\/a> from wildfires has been linked to tens of thousands of deaths annually in the United States, according to a new study. <\/p>\n The paper, published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances, found that from 2006 to 2020, long-term exposure to tiny particulates from wildfire smoke contributed to an average of 24,100 deaths a year in the lower 48 states.<\/p>\n \u201cOur message is: Wildfire smoke is very dangerous. It is an increasing threat to human health,\u201d said Yaguang Wei, a study author and assistant professor in the department of environmental medicine at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. <\/p>\n Other scientists who have studied the death toll from wildfire smoke<\/a> were not surprised by the findings. <\/p>\n \u201cThe estimates they\u2019re coming up with are reasonable,\u201d said Michael Jerrett, professor of environmental health science at the University of California, Los Angeles who was not involved in the study. \u201cWe need more of them. It\u2019s only if we’re doing multiple studies with many different designs that we gain scientific confidence of our outcomes.\u201d <\/p>\n The paper\u2019s researchers focused on deaths linked to chronic exposure to fine particulate matter, or PM2.5<\/a> \u2014 the main concern from wildfire smoke. <\/p>\n These particles can lodge deep into lungs and enter the bloodstream. Short-term exposure can trigger coughing and itchy eyes, but longer term, they can make existing health problems worse and lead to a range of chronic and deadly health issues, including respiratory illness, cardiovascular and neurological diseases, and premature death.<\/p>\n \u201cWildfire smoke PM2.5 has emerged as significant environmental hazard in the U.S., and it’s driven by increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires due to climate change<\/a>,\u201d said Min Zhang, a postdoctoral student at the Icahn School and a study author.<\/p>\n Along with decades of forest mismanagement, growing development in fire-prone areas has expanded the \u201curban wildland interface,\u201d increasing wildfire risk with real consequences for human health, said Jerrett. <\/p>\n \u201cNobody\u2019s going to have \u2018wildfire death\u2019 on their death certificate unless the fire actually burned them or a tree fell on them or something like that,\u201d said Jerrett. \u201cBut many of the people that are dying from this exposure are ones that are already more vulnerable. These are real lives that are being lost. This is not some arbitrary abstract statistical concept.\u201d<\/p>\n The study’s authors analyzed the link between annual average exposure to PM2.5 from wildfire smoke and deaths by county in the lower 48. They used federal mortality data across 3,068 counties of all causes of death and several specific ones \u2014 circulatory, neurological and respiratory diseases, as well as mental and behavioral disorders, tumors and endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases. <\/p>\n They also included deaths related to falls and transport accidents \u2014 which are unlikely to be linked to wildfire smoke \u2014 to ensure their other observations weren’t biased.<\/p>\n \u201cWe found no association for car accidents and falls, while for other diseases we found statistically significant effects,\u201d said Wei. Deaths from neurological<\/a> diseases saw the biggest increase with exposure to these particulates.<\/p>\n How pronounced the link was between particulate exposure and death varied by season and demographics. A stronger association appeared during cooler periods, and people in rural areas and younger communities appeared to be more vulnerable. <\/p>\n Researchers also found that with every 0.1 microgram per cubic meter increase of PM2.5 across all these places, about 5,594 more people died each year.<\/p>\n Jerrett said the study had the benefit of a large study population and that it includes most causes of deaths in the U.S. But he said the county-level data could have led to over or underestimates because wildfire smoke is very dynamic. \u201cIt doesn’t just blanket a large county all at once. There are going to be parts of the county that gets it a lot worse.\u201d<\/p>\n The study also did not account for other important factors, such as whether a person smokes, he said. <\/p>\n Kai Chen, an associate professor of environmental sciences at the Yale School of Public Health who has also studied the topic, said: \u201cI really like that they examined both the smoke and nonsmoke PM2.5.\u201d Various research has found that PM2.5 from wildfire smoke has bigger health impacts than pollution from other sources, such as car emissions, said Chen in an email, who was not involved in the study. <\/p>\n The Trump administration’s rollbacks in climate change policy<\/a>, even as the more destructive wildfires become more frequent in large part due to global warming, poses critical risks, the study’s authors said. Quantifying the deadly threat that PM2.5 from wildfires poses to human health shows the need for effective, urgent mitigation strategies, backed by Environmental Protection Agency monitoring and regulation, they said.<\/p>\n \u201cThis highlights the importance of controlling wildfire sourced PM2.5, which is currently not regulated by the EPA as it is usually regarded as natural disasters,\u201d Chen agreed.<\/p>\n \u2014\u2014\u2014 <\/p>\n The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP\u2019s environmental coverage, visit apnews.com\/hub\/climate-and-environment<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n