\n<\/p>\n
ATHENS, Ga. — <\/span>The Venezuelan man convicted of killing Georgia nursing student Laken Riley<\/a> is set to appear in court Friday, where a judge will hear arguments on his request for a new trial.<\/p>\n Jose Ibarra was convicted in November 2024<\/a> of murder and other crimes in Riley’s death nine months earlier. Ibarra, 28, had entered the U.S. illegally in 2022 and was allowed to stay while he pursued his immigration case. Riley\u2019s killing heightened tensions in the national debate<\/a> over immigration.<\/p>\n The first bill President Donald Trump signed<\/a> upon taking office last year, the Laken Riley Act<\/a>, was inspired by the 22-year-old’s killing. It requires the detention of people who are in the country without authorization and are accused of theft and violent crimes.<\/p>\n Prosecutors said<\/a> Ibarra encountered Riley while she was running on the University of Georgia campus in Athens on Feb. 22, 2024, and killed her during a struggle. Riley was a student at Augusta University College of Nursing, which has a campus in Athens, about 70 miles (115 kilometers) east of Atlanta.<\/p>\n Ibarra’s lawyers argue that his constitutional rights were violated by the judge’s denial of a request for a delay so the defense could have an expert review key evidence and by the admission of cellphone evidence the defense sought to exclude. They are asking that his guilty verdict and life sentence be vacated and that he be granted a new trial.<\/p>\n Under Georgia law, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of a conviction becoming final, which is the date of sentencing or the date of the denial of a motion for a new trial, whichever is later. Therefore, the filing of a motion for new trial effectively extends the deadline to file an appeal.<\/p>\n Ibarra’s trial attorneys filed a motion for a new trial within weeks of his conviction. New lawyers have since taken over his case and filed an amended motion for a new trial earlier this month.<\/p>\n Friday’s arguments will be held before Clarke County Superior Court Judge H. Patrick Haggard, who heard and decided Ibarra’s case after Ibarra waived his right to a jury trial<\/a>.<\/p>\n Before trial, Ibarra’s lawyers had asked the judge not to allow evidence stemming from the search of two cellphones the state believed belonged to Ibarra. They argued that the search warrants used to seize and search the phones were not valid because police lacked probable cause to obtain the warrants. Haggard rejected those arguments.<\/p>\n Ibarra’s trial attorneys had also asked the judge to exclude evidence and expert testimony based on the use of TrueAllele Casework, software that is used to analyze DNA. After an expert told defense attorneys she would need six weeks to review the data and complete a report, they asked the judge to delay a hearing set a few weeks before trial and, therefore, the trial. The judge ultimately proceeded with the trial as scheduled.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n