\n<\/p>\n
MINNEAPOLIS — <\/span>A federal judge will hear arguments Monday on whether she should at least temporarily halt the immigration crackdown in Minnesota that has led to the fatal shootings of two people by government officers.<\/p>\n The state of Minnesota and the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul sued the Department of Homeland Security<\/a> earlier this month, five days after Renee Good was shot by an Immigration and Customs officer. Saturday’s shooting by a Border Patrol officer of Alex Pretti<\/a> has only added urgency to the case.<\/p>\n Since the original filing, the state and cities have substantially added to their original request. They’re trying to restore the state of affairs that existed before the Trump administration launched Operation Metro Surge on Dec. 1. <\/p>\n The hearing is set for Monday morning in federal court in Minneapolis. Democratic Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said he plans to personally attend.<\/p>\n They’re asking that U.S. District Judge Kathleen Menendez order federal law enforcement agencies to reduce the numbers of officers and agents in Minnesota to levels before the surge, while allowing them to continue to enforce immigration laws within a long list of proposed limits.<\/p>\n Justice Department attorneys have called the lawsuit \u201clegally frivolous\u201d and said “Minnesota wants a veto over federal law enforcement.\u201d They asked the judge to reject the request or or at least stay her order pending an anticipated appeal.<\/p>\n Ellison said at a news conference Sunday that he and the cities filed their lawsuit because of \u201cthe unprecedented nature of this of this surge. It is a novel abuse of the Constitution that we\u2019re looking at right now. No one can remember a time when we\u2019ve seen something like this.\u201d<\/p>\n It wasn’t clear ahead of the hearing when the judge might rule.<\/p>\n The case also has implications for other states that have been or could be targets of intensive federal immigration enforcement operations. Attorneys general from 19 states plus the District of Columbia, led by California, filed a friend-of-the-court brief<\/a> supporting Minnesota.<\/p>\n “If left unchecked, the federal government will no doubt be emboldened to continue its unlawful conduct in Minnesota and to repeat it elsewhere,\u201d the attorneys general wrote.<\/p>\n Menendez is the same judge who ruled in a separate case<\/a> on Jan. 16 that federal officers in Minnesota can\u2019t detain or tear gas peaceful protesters who aren\u2019t obstructing authorities, including people who are following and observing agents. <\/p>\n An appeals court temporarily suspended<\/a> that ruling three days before Saturday\u2019s shooting. But the plaintiffs in that case, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, asked the appeals court late Saturday for an emergency order<\/a> lifting the stay in light of Pretti’s killing. The Justice Department argued in a reply<\/a> filed Sunday that the stay should remain in place, calling the injunction unworkable and overly broad.<\/p>\n In yet another case, a different federal judge, Eric Tostrud, late Saturday issued an order<\/a> blocking the Trump administration from \u201cdestroying or altering evidence\u201d related to Saturday’s shooting. Ellison and Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty asked for the order to try to preserve evidence collected by federal officials that state authorities have not yet been able to inspect. A hearing in that case is scheduled for Monday afternoon in federal court in St. Paul.<\/p>\n \u201cThe fact that anyone would ever think that an agent of the federal government might even think about doing such a thing was completely unforeseeable only a few weeks ago,” Ellison told reporters. \u201cBut now, this is what we have to do.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n