\n<\/p>\n
WASHINGTON — <\/span>Two judges in Virginia are rejecting Trump administration arguments that a White House loyalist<\/a> can continue serving as a top federal prosecutor in the state, with one on Tuesday soliciting applications for a replacement<\/a> and the other prohibiting Lindsey Halligan from continuing to represent herself<\/a> in his court as a United States attorney.<\/p>\n The dual orders from separate judges marked a dramatic new front in an ongoing clash between the Trump administration and the federal court over the legitimacy of Halligan\u2019s appointment. A White House aide with no prior prosecutorial experience, Halligan was picked for the role by President Donald Trump in September only to have a judge two months later rule that the appointment was illegal. <\/a><\/p>\n The Trump administration has kept Halligan in place despite that ruling, but on Tuesday, two judges made clear that they believed it was time for her tenure to end. Similar disputes have occurred in other districts across the country, where judges have rejected other Trump administration efforts to install acting prosecutors outside conventional protocol.<\/p>\n In one order, M. Hannah Lauck, the chief judge of the Eastern District of Virginia and a nominee of President Barack Obama, directed a clerk to publish a vacancy announcement on the court’s website and with the news media and said she was \u201csoliciting expressions of interest in serving in that position.\u201d The judge noted that the 120-day appointment given to Halligan, who has since been nominated by Trump but not confirmed by the Senate, expires on Tuesday.<\/p>\n In a separate order, U.S. District Judge David Novak said he was striking the words \u201cUnited States Attorney\u201d from the signature block of an indictment in a case that was before him, and barred her from continuing to represent herself with that title. He said he would initiate disciplinary proceedings against Halligan if she violated his order and persisted in identifying herself in court filings as a U.S. attorney, and said other signatories could be subject to discipline as well.<\/p>\n \u201cNo matter all of her machinations, Ms. Halligan has no legal basis to represent to this Court that she holds the position. And any such representation going forward can only be described as a false statement made in direct defiance of valid court orders,\u201d Novak wrote. \u201cIn short, this charade of Ms. Halligan masquerading as the United States Attorney for this District in direct defiance of binding court orders must come to an end.\u201d<\/p>\n